WTO win could open China’s door to US companies

by Shu on August 13, 2009

in Trade

GENEVA — The United States has defeated China in a wide-ranging ruling at the World Trade
Organization that could provide massive market opportunities for American makers of everything
from CDs and DVDs to music downloads and books.

The verdict Wednesday finds definitively against China for forcing American media producers to
route their business in China through Chinese state-owned companies. It could also set a larger
precedent for others such as U.S. automakers claiming to be hampered by cumbersome
distribution rules in the communist country.

The WTO victory comes as President Barack Obama is being pressed to be tough on trade rules
with China, which many Democrats in the U.S. Congress blame for America’s soaring trade
deficits and lost manufacturing jobs.

The Associated Press reported the main findings of the then-confidential ruling last month, but
the public release of the 464-page document on Wednesday revealed dozens of smaller
decisions that support the complaints of trade associations representing record labels such as
EMI and Sony BMG; publishers including McGraw Hill and Simon & Schuster; and, to a lesser
extent, the major Hollywood studios of Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount, Universal and 20th
Century Fox.

It also offers hopes of greater business for Apple Inc.’s iTunes store, finding that China was
breaking trade rules by preventing companies offering music downloads to computers and mobile
phones from offering their services directly to Chinese customers.

The ruling stopped short of a complete U.S. victory as the three-member panel delivered mixed
findings on Chinese censorship rules that apply to American-made goods, but not to Chinese
products. It also permitted China to make U.S. films go through one of two designated distributors
to be shown in Chinese cinemas, a requirement not required of Chinese movies.

The Chinese Commerce Ministry could not immediately be reached, but U.S. Trade
Representative Ron Kirk called the ruling a "significant victory to America’s creative industries."
"These findings are an important step toward ensuring market access for legitimate U.S. products
in the Chinese market, as well as ensuring market access for U.S. exporters and distributors of
those products," Kirk said in a statement. "We will work tirelessly so that American companies
and workers can fully realize the market opening benefits that this decision signals."
The panel found that "China has acted inconsistently with provisions" of the agreement it made
with all WTO members when it joined the global trade body in 2001, as well as the General
Agreement on Trade in Services and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade that governs trade
between all WTO members.

It instructed Beijing to "bring the relevant measures into conformity with its obligations under
those agreements."

Despite the looming WTO decision, there has been no indications in China of an internal debate
on the issue of relaxing restrictions on imports. This is an extremely sensitive issued for the ruling
Communist Party, which seeks to keep out content deemed politically or socially objectionable,
as well as to protect Chinese filmmakers and other content producers from foreign competition.
However, China has committed itself to the WTO process, so there’s little chance that a verdict
can be completely ignored. One possible outcome is that the government will come up with a
compromise, perhaps setting up new regulations and procedures for vetting and approving
cultural imports that would allow a marginally wider opening of the market.

That may not be enough for American record labels, film studios and publishers, who could ask
the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to pressure China into full compliance by threatening
retaliatory trade sanctions. The WTO can authorize higher tariffs and other measures against
countries failing to adhere to the rules, but generally only after years of litigation.

China can appeal the ruling, but officials at the country’s WTO mission in Geneva declined to
comment.

 

 

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: